Kapidag WEPP
· · —
This grade is generated by CarbonDecode's automated, documented rubric from public registry data and project-type priors. A project-specific analyst, document, or satellite review has not been run for this project, so the score reflects expected performance for its class rather than a bespoke due-diligence assessment. How our ratings are built →
Dimension breakdown · CCP-aligned
An executive read on the rating, anomalies the rubric can’t see, and the diligence questions to put to the developer, generated by Claude over the full project record. Available on Pro.
Upgrade to ProLocates and reads the project's actual Project Design Document and verification reports, then tests the additionality argument, baseline, and quantification against the methodology, with quotes. Available on Pro.
Upgrade to ProGathers satellite and Earth-observation evidence (Global Forest Watch forest-loss, MethaneSAT/IMEO, published analyses) for the project area and assesses reversal and emissions anomalies, with sources. Available on Pro.
Upgrade to ProScoring rationale · auditable trail
See exactly why each dimension scored as it did, every rule, adjustment, and data point behind the grade. The auditable trail buyers and assurance teams need. Available on Pro.
Upgrade to Pro